The result is a dark yet saturated green. Had to sand the bronze-green paint off a window sash recently. Their color-dispenser is computer-driven, so why not drive it with the numbers I supply? Is this because companies don't offer these colors - maybe they don't want to put a pint of tinting color in a $25 gallon of paint - or because the tinting colors are weak - adulterated is the word - or because mixtures of colors cannot be saturated? I'm trying to get an explanation from Valspar of why they cannot formulate paint to RGB numbers, with no result so far. The stronger colors don't even come close, as you will find if you try them in EasyRGB. They were painted in mineral pigments, which colors cannot be reproduced by tinting colors at your local paint store. I like Pick Pic or the one in the color exploration program I use, Color Impact. If you don't have the RGB code but can digitize your image (paint chip in your case) or whatever and then capture any pixel color with a free pixel grabber. I am not sure how to do it on a fruit machine.Įasy RGB will offer you the option to calibrate your monitor on a per use basis. There is a preset for this in the settings and display section of Windows. Pick a paint manufacturer's color collection, and the system will kick out the four nearest colors from that collection along with the code number and name.Īny time you are working with color matching you should set your monitor to the standard for viewing color: 6500K. If you have it, simply type in the RGB code for the color you want. I use the translator all the time with good results though. In fairness to the prior poster doing so is really somewhat subjective and one system is transmitted color while paint is reflective color. It does a great job of translating RGB codes to paint. Offers free access in addition to several commercial products. I've seen many of our C2 chips come back to our store with paint dabs on them from stores who've "scanned' them. Some colors just can't be created into every brand. * The darker or more vivid the color, the farther they're off. C2 for instance, uses SIXTEEN available colorants. * Other brands color-codes do little good, since EVERY company uses different colorants. The scanners' light beam is too strong, and often reflects poorly off material. * Then the tweaking Scanning fabric rarely works, and we don't do it. * Since the "Matched" formula is never actually MADE, there's no way to tell until it's actually mixed. * A fair number of these "matches" need further work. * I'll phrase it this way."They're usually fairly close". * All they are, are scanned matches of competitor fandecks, and translated into a particular brands colorant database, and stored into the "twice-yearly" update packages that each store can buy from their tinting-software vendor. * The "Illusion" of every paint store possesses magic computers that have perfect matches stored for every brands' color out there is pure bunk. NO.paint Co.'s don't "share" their colors/formulas! Twice-yearly updates are purchased for competitor fandeck-matches. We've got very good software, and a very good scanner. ![]() I match paint all the time, and am getting very good at it over the years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |